Review: Ford EF.I Fairmont (1994-95)

Overview

Released in August 1994, the Ford EF Series I (EF.I) Fairmont was available as a sedan or wagon, while the Fairmont Ghia was solely as available as the former. Manufactured in Campbellfield, Victoria, the rear-wheel drive Fairmont was available with either a 4.0-litre inline six-cylinder petrol engine or a 4.9-litre V8 petrol engine. A four-speed automatic transmission was fitted as standard across the range.

Engines

Of the engines,

• the 4.0-litre inline six cylinder engine had a casst iron block, an alloy cylinder head, a single overhead camshaft (SOHC, two valves per cylinder and a compression ratio of 9.3:1. For the EF Falcon, this engine had was fitted with upgraded internal components, a dual intake system and a new EEC-V engine management system; and,
• the 4.9-litre pushrod V8 engine had a cast iron block and cylinder head, two valves per cylinder and a compression ratio of 9.0:1.

Dimensions and suspension

The EF Fairmont sedan was 4906 mm long, 1861 mm wide, 1453 mm tall and had a 2791 mm long wheelbase. The wagon models, however, were 136 mm longer (at 5042 mm), 5 mm narrower (1856 mm), 76 mm taller (1529 mm) and had 132 mm longer wheelbases (2923 mm). Furthermore, the EF Fairmont had Short Long Arm (SLA) front suspension and sedans had a live rear axle with four trailing arms and Watts linkages; wagons, however, had a live rear axle with leaf springs.

EF Changes

Compared to its ED predecessor, the EF Fairmont could be identified by its more rounded body panels and elongated headlights. Inside, cup holders were fitted as standard and there was a new floor-mounted hand brake. The EF Falcon was also fitted with new a crankshaft and hydraulic engine mounts for greater refinement.

Safety equipment

Standard safety equipment for the EF Fairmont included a driver’s airbag and ABS. Beyond this, the Fairmont Ghia was further equipped with a front passenger airbag.

Features

Standard features for the EF Fairmont included 15-inch alloy wheels, an eight speaker sound system (six speakers for wagons), climate control air conditioning, velour seats, cruise control, 60/40 split and folding rear seats, remote central locking, power windows and mirrors, a rake and reach adjustable steering wheel, height adjustable driver’s seat, trip computer and immobiliser; wagon models were also fitted with roof racks.

The Fairmont Ghia was further equipped with a nine speaker, 250 watt sound system sound system with Digital Signal Processing and a six-stack boot-mounted CD player, velour seat facings with leather bolsters and a leather-wrapped steering wheel.

Review: Ford EF.II Fairmont (1995-96)

Overview

Released in October 1995, the EF Series II (EF.II) Fairmont introduced a revised range as the Fairmont Ghia was fitted with a more powerful six cylinder engine, lowered suspension, limited slip rear differential, uprated front springs and additional chrome highlights. Furthermore, the front suspension of the Fairmont and Fairmont Ghia was modified for more stable cornering by raising the position of the front ball joint, reducing toe-in, fitting a thicker anti-roll bar and firmer lower wishbone bushes.

Visually, the EF.II Fairmont and Fairmont Ghia could be identified by their convex passenger-side door mirror. Inside, there was reduced front seat padding for a lower driving position and reduced cabin noise due to the introduction of neoprene rubber insulation.

Safety equipment

Compared to their EF.I predecessors, standard safety equipment for the EF.II was largely unchanged. For models with front bench seats, however, the Fairmont Ghia was fitted with a front passenger airbag which provided protection for the front, middle passenger.

Features

Standard features for the EF.II Fairmont was largely unchanged, though the Fairmont Ghia was fitted with leather upholstery as standard.

Related links

• Wikipedia.org: Ford EF Falcon

Overview

Released in September 1996, the Ford EL Fairmont was available as sedan or wagon, while the Fairmont Ghia was solely as available as the former. Manufactured in Campbellfield, Victoria, the rear-wheel drive Fairmont was available with a 4.0-litre inline six cylinder or 4.9-litre V8 petrol engine. A four-speed automatic transmission was fitted as standard across the range.

Engines: I6 and V8

Of the engines,

• the 4.0-litre inline six cylinder engine had a cast iron block, an alloy cylinder head, single overhead camshaft (SOHC), two valves per cylinder and a compression ratio of 9.3:1; and,
• the 4.9-litre pushrod V8 engine had a cast iron block and cylinder head, two valves per cylinder and a compression ratio of 9.0:1.

EL Developments

Compared to its EF Fairmont predecessor, the EL Fairmont had a quieter cabin due to the introduction of thicker glass and additional dashboard insulation; the coil-pack ignition system was also replaced with a distributor. Visually, the EL Fairmont could be identified by its new bonnet, front bumper and headlights. Inside, there were reshaped seats and headrests, while the ‘Smart Tint’ window film provided SPF15 UV protection.

Dimensions

The EL Fairmont sedan was 4906 mm long, 1861 mm wide, 1453 mm tall and had a 2791 mm long wheelbase. The wagon models, however, were 136 mm longer (at 5042 mm), 5 mm narrower (1856 mm), 76 mm taller (1529 mm) and had 132 mm longer wheelbases (2923 mm).

Suspension

The EL Fairmont had Short Long Arm (SLA) front suspension and sedans had a live rear axle with four trailing arms and Watts linkages. For the EL, however, the rear suspension was revised to reduce roll oversteer by lowering the Watts link pivot point by 20 mm and changing the geometry of the rear upper arms; the front and rear spring rates were also reduced for greater ride comfort. Wagon models, however, continued with their Hotchkiss (leaf spring) rear suspension largely unchanged.

Safety equipment

Standard safety equipment included for the EL Fairmont consisted of a driver’s airbag and ABS; Fairmont Ghia models were further equipped with a front passenger airbag.

Features

Standard features for the EL Fairmont included 15-inch alloy wheels, six speaker sound system, climate control air conditioning, cruise control, velour seats, 60/40 split and folding rear seats, reote central locking, power windows and mirrors, a rake and reach adjustable steering wheel, height adjustable driver’s seat, trip computer and immobiliser; wagon models were also fitted with roof racks.

Beyond this, the EL Fairmont Ghia added a nine speaker, 250 watt sound system with a six-disc boot-mounted CD player, leather-trimmed seats, leather-wrapped steering wheel and woodgrain interior trim. The Fairmont Ghia was also fitted with speed-sensitive power steering and a limited slip differential.

Related links

• Wikipedia.org: Ford EL Falcon

Review: Ford BA.I Fairmont (2002-04)

Overview

Released in October 2002, the BA Mk.I (BA.I) Fairmont was a large, rear-wheel drive sedan. Based on the BA Falcon , and manufactured in Campbellfield, Victoria, the Ford BA Fairmont and Fairmont Ghia were available with either a 4.0-litre inline six cylinder petrol engine or a 5.4-litre V8 petrol engine.

Engines: Barra 182 and Barra 220

Of the engines,

• The 4.0-litre Barra 182 inline six-cylinder petrol engine had a cast iron block, a cast aluminium cylinder head, double overhead camshafts (DOHC, simplex chain-driven), dual infinitely variable camshaft adjustment (within a 60 degree range), four valves per cylinder, Duratec-style finger followers, a dual resonance inlet manifold, coil-on-plug ignition and a compression ratio of 9.7:1. Compared to its Intech predecessor, changes for the Barra six cylinder engine included a new cylinder head (50 per cent stiffer than its predecessor), forged camshafts (previously cast iron), new combustion chambers, port design, a single chain drive for the camshafts, electronic ‘drive by wire’ throttle control, internal exhaust gas recirculation, a crank-mounted oil pump, new knock sensors (for improved performance on premium unleaded fuel) and an upgraded Powertrain Control Module (PCM). The rev limit was also raised to 6000 rpm (previously 5700 rpm); and,
• Manufactured at Ford’s Windsor plant in Canada, the 5.4-litre Barra 220 V8 engine had a cast iron block, a cast aluminium cylinder head, sintered connecting rods, a single overhead camshaft (SOHC), variable camshaft timing (over 60 degrees relative to the crankshaft), three valves per cylinder (two intake, one exhaust), roller finger followers, coil on plug ignition and a compression ratio of 9.7:1. Compared to its 4.9-litre Windsor V8 predecessor, changes included a stiffer block, reshaped pistons (with longer side skirts), magnesium cam covers, electronic throttle control, internal exhaust gas recirculation and failsafe-cooling protection (previously limited to inline six cylinder engines).

Transmissions

The Ford BA Fairmont had four-speed BTR M93LE and BTR M97LE automatic transmissions for the six- and eight-cylinder engines, respectively. For the BA range, changes for the automatic transmissions included a higher contact ratio gear set, a new design alloy plate (finned) transmission oil cooler and upgrades for the valve body, pump assemblies and torque converters.

Development and dimensions

Compared to its AU Fairmont predecessor, the BA Fairmont chassis achieved an 88 per cent increase in torsional rigidity. Other developments for the BA Falcon and Fairmont included:

• Independent rear suspension (detailed below) and a new two-piece drive shaft with a constant velocity (CV) joint at the differential;
• A new alloy cross member under the transmission with alloy mountings;
• A stainless steel exhaust system was fitted as standard and, for sedans, exhaust capacity increased to 36 litres (previously 17 litres);
• A stiffer steering column, quicker steering ratio (2.8 turns lock-to-lock) and revised steering gear;
• New hydraulic engine mounts; and,
• New insulating foam between the body and carpets.

Relative to the AU Fairmont , the BA Fairmont sedan was 9 mm longer (at 4916 mm), 6 mm narrower (1864 mm), 37 mm lower (1444 mm) and had a 36 mm longer wheelbase (2829 mm); its drag coefficient also decreased to 0.292 Cd (previously 0298 Cd). As a result of the stiffer chassis and independent rear suspension, kerb mass increased by 144 kg for the standard Fairmont.

Suspension

The Ford BA Fairmont had double wishbone front suspension and independent rear suspension (IRS) which had three control arms:

• A forged upper control arm;
• A stamped front lower control arm; and,
• A stamped rear lower control arm.

Each control arm had a cross axis ball joint on the wheel assembly end and was attached to the subframe and knuckle. Furthermore, the ‘Control Blade’ was a stamped trailing arm which provided lateral support and acted as a vertical pivot point.

Safety equipment

Standard safety equipment for the Ford BA Fairmont included dual front airbags, front side airbags, ABS, electronic brake force distribution, traction control and front seatbelts with pretensioners and load limiters.

Brakes

The Ford BA Fairmont had 298 mm by 28 mm ventilated front brake discs with twin-piston callipers rotors and 303 mm by 16mm solid rear discs with single piston callipers.

ANCAP crash testing

In ANCAP crash testing , the related BA.I Falcon with dual front airbags – but not front side airbags as fitted in the Fairmont – received a four star adult occupant protection rating with a score of 27.27 out of 37.

Features: Fairmont and Fairmont Ghia

Standard features for the Ford BA Fairmont included 16-inch alloy wheels, a six speaker sound system with six-stack CD player, dual zone climate control air conditioning, velour upholstery with a two-tone ‘Stone’ trim interior, a four-way power adjustable driver’s seat, front passenger seat adjustable lumbar support, cruise control, a leather-wrapped steering wheel (with audio and cruise controls), automatic headlights, a 60/40 split and folding rear seat, remote central locking, power mirrors and windows, a height adjustable driver’s seat, tilt and reach adjustable steering wheel, illuminated footwells, maple woodgrain trim with mahogany highlights, a trip computer and an immobiliser.

The Ford BA Fairmont Ghia was further equipped with 17-inch alloy wheels with sports suspension, an eleven speaker sound system, leather seats, a six-way power adjustable driver’s seat, driver’s seat and mirror memory settings, a leather-wrapped gearshift and park brake, colour TFT screen with advanced trip computer functions, front cornering lamps, rear parking sensors, front door courtesy lamps, illuminated vanity mirrors, shopping bag net, automatically dipping passenger mirror when reversing, power adjustable pedals and woodgrain interior trim with a black and maple finish.

Review: Ford BA.II Fairmont (2004-05)

Overview

Released in October 2004, the Ford BA Mark II (BA.II) was a minor update for the Fairmont range. There were minor cosmetic changes, though the range itself was unchanged.

Features

Standard features for the BA.II Fairmont were extended to include rear parking sensors and power adjustable pedals. The Fairmont Ghia was fitted with new 17-inch alloy wheels and a leather/woodgrain sports steering wheel and gearshift.

Related links

• Wikipedia.org: Ford BA Falcon

Review: Ford BF.I Fairmont (2005-06)

Overview

Released in October 2005, the Ford BF Mark I (BF.I) Fairmont was a large sedan. Manufactured in Campbellfield, Victoria, the rear-wheel drive BF.I Fairmont and Fairmont Ghia were available with 4.0-litre petrol, 4.0-litre LPG engines and 5.4-litre V8 petrol engines.

Engines: Barra 190, E-Gas (LPG) and Barra 230

Of the engines,

• The 4.0-litre Barra 190 inline six-cylinder petrol engine had a cast iron block, a cast aluminium cylinder head, double overhead camshafts (DOHC, simplex chain-driven), dual independent variable camshaft timing, four valves per cylinder, Duratec-style finger followers, a dual resonance inlet manifold, coil-on-plug ignition, electronic throttle control, exhaust gas recirculation and a compression ratio of 10.3:1. Compared to its Barra 182 predecessor, changes for the Barra 190 engine included independent variable camshaft timing (i.e. each phaser could rotate each camshaft independently), a revised camshaft profile, a second knock sensor so that ignition timing could be optimised for each cylinder, revised piston crown profiles for a higher increased compression ratio, lower viscosity engine oil (5W30 GF3, previously 10W30 GF2), a lighter driveplate assembly, a new air intake and a revised exhaust system (with a new front resonator and retuned centre and rear mufflers);
• Compared to the Barra 190 engine , the 4.0-litre Barra E-Gas dedicated LPG engine had a Vialle closed-loop single-point carburetion system, a compression ratio of 10.3:1 and hardened valves and valve seats. For the BF range, the E-Gas engine had a lower compression ratio since it shared its pistons with the Barra 190 engine, had a revised venturi (for better air/fuel mixing), throttle body and inlet pipe, and satisfied Euro III emissions standards. For sedans, the tank fitted under the rear of the vehicle and had a capacity of 93 litres (116 litres for wagons);
• The 5.4-litre Barra 230 V8 engine had a cast iron block, a cast aluminium cylinder head, sintered connecting rods, a single overhead camshaft (SOHC), variable camshaft timing (over 60 degrees relative to the crankshaft), three valves per cylinder (two intake, one exhaust), roller finger followers, coil on plug ignition and a compression ratio of 9.7:1. Changes for the BF range included the introduction of dual knock sensors for more aggressive ignition calibration, ECU modifications, a larger diameter rear muffler (previously shared with the same Barra 182) and Euro III emissions compliance.

For the BF range, ‘transient’ rpm limits were introduced for the six cylinder engines which momentarily allowed engine speed to exceed the prescribed rev limit during upshifting – this enabled wide open throttle upshifting to occur at an engine speed closer to the rev limiter than would otherwise be possible.

Transmissions

Of the transmissions,

• The naturally aspirated six-cylinder engines were available with four-speed BTR M93LE (also known as ION 93-4AT) and six-speed ZFHP26 automatic transmissions; and,
• The V8 engines were solely available with six-speed ZFHP26 automatic transmissions.

For the BF range, the four-speed BTR M93LE automatic transmissions were upgraded with:

• Stronger gearsets;
• Radial dead-end groove clutch plates and a second ‘Ball Check valve’ in the valve body for improved oil flow;
• The introduction of Grade Control Logic (previously introduced in the SX Territory );
• An accelerator pedal detent and kickdown switch;
• Revised software for improved shift schedules; and,
• Calibration improvements for more refined and consistent shift feel.

First introduced in the BMW E65 and E66 7-Series , the six-speed ZF 6HP26 automatic transmission was available in two versions: a standard version with a torque capacity of 450 Nm and a high-performance 600 Nm version (for use with the Barra 230, Barra 245T and Boss 260 engines) which had upgraded clutches with extra plates in the clutch packs. For its use in the BF Fairmont, hardware changes for the ZF 6HP26 transmission included a unique transmission main case, torque converter, output/driveshaft flange and a new transmission cross member attachment (shared with the four-speed automatic). The ZF transmission featured adaptive ‘Driver Recognition’ behaviour, including brake support downshifts, gear holding when cornering, gear holding for uphill and downhill driving and gear holding for fast-off throttle driving situations.

For all automatic transmissions, a new remote transmission oil cooler (RTOC) – with a three-way coolant thermostat – was mounted to the engine block. Acting as a heat exchanger, coolant lines (or tubes) passed through the radiator to warm-up the transmission fluid on start-up and provide cooling under high load/high temperature operating conditions.

Development and dimensions

Since the BF Fairmont had the same platform as its BA Fairmont predecessor, greater refinement was a significant objective in its development. To this end, the following changes were made:

• The introduction of a two-piece, lofted outer dashboard;
• The addition of bitumastic pads to the body for damping of low- and mid-frequency noises;
• The introduction of an absorptive roof-liner;
• Improved static sealing;
• Body structure improvements through the fitment of a reinforcing box section to the transmission cross member and centre bearing body reinforcement;
• New engine and transmission mounts;
• Redesigned exhaust hangers to isolate muffler vibration from the body; and,
• For the Fairmont Ghia, a sound dampening pack was introduced to reduce noise experienced by rear seat occupants.

Other developments for the BF Falcon and Fairmont included:

• The introduction of Bosch ABS 8.0 (previously 5.3) which included electronic brake force distribution;
• An upgraded traction control system and the introduction of electronic stability control and cornering brake control;
• A revised pedal map for the electronic throttle control; and,
• A higher-output alternator for improved fuel economy, lower rotational speeds and lower fan speeds.

Compared to the BA Fairmont , the BF Fairmont had the same dimensions such that the sedan was 4916 mm long, 1864 mm wide, 1444 mm high and had a 2829 mm long wheelbase.

Visually, the BF Fairmont could be identified by its new front bumper, tail-lamps and alloy wheel designs. The Fairmont Ghia was distinguished by its front fog lights (replacing its predecessor’s cornering lights) and extended chrome highlights, including a full-width chrome strip across the lower grille opening. Inside, the BF Fairmont introduced new seat fabrics and soft-feel door grab handles.

Suspension

The Ford BF Fairmont had double wishbone front suspension and independent rear suspension (IRS) which had three control arms:

• A forged upper control arm;
• A stamped front lower control arm; and,
• A stamped rear lower control arm.

Each control arm had a cross axis ball joint on the wheel assembly end and was attached to the subframe and knuckle. Furthermore, the ‘Control Blade’ was a stamped trailing arm which provided lateral support and acted as a vertical pivot point.

Safety equipment

Standard safety equipment for the Ford BF.I Fairmont included dual front airbags, ABS, electronic brake force distribution, front side airbags, traction control (except for the 4.0-litre LPG models) and front seatbelts with pretensioners and load limiters. The Fairmont Ghia was further equipped with electronic stability control, including cornering brake control.

Brakes

The standard braking package for the BF Fairmont consisted of 298 mm by 28 mm vented front brake discs with twin-piston callipers and 303 mm by 16 mm solid rear discs with single piston callipers.

Models with V8 engines, however, had a premium braking package which consisted of 322 mm by 28 mm vented front brake discs and 328 mm by 26 mm vented rear discs.

ANCAP crash testing

Occupant protection for the BF Falcon and Fairmont were comparable with their BA predecessors. In ANCAP crash testing , the BA Falcon XT fitted with dual front airbags – but not front side airbags as fitted in the Fairmont – received a four star adult occupant protection rating with a score of 27.27 out of 37.

Features: Fairmont and Fairmont Ghia

Standard features for the Ford BF Fairmont included 16-inch ten-spoke alloy wheels, a six speaker sound system with six-stack CD player, dual zone climate control air conditioning, velour upholstery, a six-way power adjustable driver’s seat, front passenger seat adjustable lumbar support, cruise control, rear parking sensors, a leather-wrapped steering wheel (with audio and cruise controls), automatic headlights, a 60/40 split and folding rear seat, remote central locking, power mirrors and windows, power adjustable pedals, a height adjustable driver’s seat, tilt and reach adjustable steering wheel, illuminated footwells, maple woodgrain trim with mahogany highlights, a trip computer and an immobiliser. Inside, the Interior Command Console (ICC) and centre console surround were finished in ‘Titanium Stone Metallic’ and the woodgrain had a Ruby Mahogany finish.

The BF Fairmont Ghia was further equipped with 17-inch nine-spoke alloy wheels with sports suspension, an eleven speaker sound system, leather seats, an eight-way power adjustable driver’s seat, driver’s seat and mirror memory settings, a leather/woodgrain sports steering wheel and gearshift, colour TFT screen with advanced trip computer functions, fog lamps, front door courtesy lamps, illuminated vanity mirrors, shopping bag net, automatically dipping passenger mirror when reversing, and woodgrain interior trim with a black and maple finish. Inside, Inside, the ICC and centre console surround had a ‘Liquid Metal’ finish and the woodgrain had a ‘Rabbit Rose’ finish.

Review: Ford BF.II Fairmont (2006-08)

Overview

Released in October 2006, the BF Mark II (BF.II) Fairmont introduced the six-speed ZF automatic transmission for the standard Fairmont and the four-speed automatic transmission was upgraded with faster warm-up, reduced friction losses and a revised powertrain control module.

For the BF.II Fairmont, the 4.0-litre six cylinder LPG engines featured a new induction system – developed to work with the advanced Electronic Throttle Control – while a new balancer hose, ductwork and piping provided a better under-bonnet layout and improved reliability.

Visually, the BF.II Fairmont could be identified by its new tapered bonnet, more aggressive front bumper design and headlamp treatments. The Fairmont Ghia was distinguished by its new 17-inch seven-spoke alloy wheels, dark accent headlamp treatment, chrome grille, bejewelled fog lights and front bumper finishes, and XR-style side skirts and rear bumper.

Safety equipment

For the standard BF.II Fairmont, electronic stability control (including cornering brake control) was standard for models fitted with the six-speed automatic transmission. To coincide with the release of the BF.II Fairmont, a limited-run ‘Euro Sports Package’ was offered which featured 17-inch alloy wheels, electronic stability control and the six-speed automatic transmission.

From July 2007, electronic stability control was standard on the 4.0-litre petrol Fairmont.

Features

Compared to its predecessor, standard features for the BF.II Fairmont were substantially unchanged. The BF.II Fairmont Ghia interior featured ‘China Beige’ leather seats, new front seat headrests, a ‘black chrome’ instrument cluster, chrome air vents and black onyx Interior Command Centre.

Related links

• Wikipedia.org: Ford BF Falcon

Review: Ford AU.I Fairmont (1998-00)

Overview

Released in September 1998, the Ford AU Series I (AU.I) Fairmont range was available as a large sedan or wagon. Manufactured in Campbellfield, Victoria, the rear-wheel drive Ford AU.I Fairmont and Fairmont Ghia were available with 4.0-litre inline six cylinder and 4.9-litre V8 unit petrol engines.

Engines: Intech, Intech VCT, LPG and V8

Of the engines,

• The 4.0-litre Intech six cylinder petrol engine had cast iron block, an alloy cylinder head, sequential electronic fuel injection, a single overhead camshaft (SOHC, chain-driven), two valves per cylinder, an EEC V control unit and a compression ratio of 9.65:1. Compared to its predecessors, the Intech engine had a more rigid block, a new cylinder head, triple-layered steel head gasket, more rigid crankshaft with larger bearings, lighter Teflon-coated pistons, lighter connecting rods, single conical valve springs, a cast aluminium sump (cross-bolted through the main bearing caps), electronic distributorless ignition system (EDIS) and a ‘limp home’ mode which enabled the engine to keep running without coolant fluid. Furthermore, a flexible decoupler between the exhaust manifold and new catalytic converter enabled a lower idle speed of 550 rpm;
• For the Fairmont Ghia, the Intech VCT engine added variable cam timing (VCT) and a low back pressure exhaust system. The VCT system used different camshaft profiles to increase torque from 1000-3700 rpm and power beyond 3700 rpm. The VCT module was mounted on the front of the engine and adjusted camshaft timing via an oil pressure-driven helix;
• As an option, the Fairmont was available with a dual fuel (i.e. LPG/petrol) system which used had Vialle liquid-to-gas converter, venturi gas/air mixer in the intake tract and used the EEC V control module to manage both the LPG and petrol systems. When starting, the petrol/LPG mix would depend on conditions and, once started, the engine would run solely on LPG. The dual fuel system weighed 85 kg and dual fuel models therefore had modified suspension. For sedan models, the tank was fitted under the rear window shelf, while wagon models had a toroidal tank under the rear floor; and,
• The 4.9-litre pushrod Windsor V8 engine had a cast iron block and cylinder head, two valves per cylinder, EEC V engine management and a compression ratio of 9.1:1. For the AU range, the V8 engines were based on a later generation small block developed for the Ford UT Explorer. Compared to its predecessor, this V8 engine had GT40P cylinder heads with centralised platinum spark plugs, a ‘high flow’ fuel intake system, new inlet manifold and distributorless ignition.

Transmissions

The AU Fairmont was available with four-speed BTR M93LE and M97LE automatic transmissions for the six and eight cylinder models, respectively. For the AU range, the automatic transmissions were upgraded with:

• A multi-groove C1 (clutch #1) plate friction elements for smoother gear engagements; and,
• A ‘variable pressure solenoid’ which improved shift quality.

Development and dimensions

Developed in conjunction with the AU Falcon at a cost of $700 million, the AU Fairmont had a new body structure with straightened side rails that were welded together to a beam behind the front bumper. The AU Fairmont was around 35 kg lighter than its predecessor, in part due to its 4 kg lighter body structure and 8 kg lighter bake-hardened steel panels. Despite these mass reductions, body lateral bending rigidity increased 20 per cent, longitudinal bending rigidity was up 17.5 per cent and torsional rigidity increased by 13.8 per cent.

Other innovations for the AU Falcon and Fairmont included new headlights for a 30 per cent increase in light projection, triple weather-strip sealing for the doors (previously double weather-strips) and new sound proofing materials – sourced from OrbSeal Australia – which expanded during the paint baking process to fill gaps and cavities more effectively.

Compared to its EL Fairmont predecessor, the AU Fairmont sedan was 11 mm shorter (at 4907 mm), 9 mm wider (1870 mm), 20 mm taller (1481 mm) and had a 2 mm longer wheelbase (2793 mm). Compared to the sedans, the wagons were 151 mm longer (at 5058 mm), 49 mm taller (1530 mm) and the wheelbase was extended by 129 mm (2922 mm). The AU Fairmont sedan and wagon had drag coefficients of 0.295 and 0.341 Cd, respectively.

Relative to the AU Falcon , the Fairmont could be identified by the raised centre section of its bonnet, more prominent grille with chrome edge capping and unique headlights with chrome bezels and clear side indicator lenses. The standard Fairmont had a chrome front hood moulding with a body-coloured centre bar and grille mesh; the Fairmont Ghia, however, was distinguished by its bright silver bumper inserts, black mesh grille and chrome centre bar. 

Suspension

The Ford AU Fairmont introduced double-wishbone front suspension as standard for all models, while three different rear suspensions were offered:

• The standard Fairmont sedans had a live rear axle with unequal length upper and lower longitudinal arms, an anti-roll bar and Watts links pivoting off the differential housing to side rail brackets;
• The Fairmont wagon had ‘Wide Trac’ rear suspension which differed in that the shock absorbers were located outboard of the leaf springs and angled towards the front of the car; and,
• The Fairmont Ghia had multi-link, double wishbone independent rear suspension that had adjustable toe links and was isolated via a rear subframe.

Safety equipment

Standard safety equipment for the Ford AU.I Fairmont included a driver’s airbag and ABS, while the Fairmont Ghia was further equipped with a front passenger airbag and traction control. From May 1999, the Fairmont was fitted with a front passenger airbag as standard.

Brakes

The AU.I Fairmont had 287 mm by 24 mm vented front brake discs and 287 mm by 10.5 mm solid rear discs.

Features: Fairmont and Fairmont Ghia

Standard features for the Ford AU Fairmont included 15-inch alloy wheels, a six speaker sound system with a 100 watt amplifier and CD player, climate control air conditioning, woven velour seats, remote central locking, power mirrors and windows, power antenna, rake and reach steering wheel adjustment, trip computer and immobiliser. For wagon models, an optional third row of seats was available with separate backrest and capable of being folded forward.

Relative to the AU Falcon, the AU Fairmont was fitted with a higher instrument panel with wood paneling, an analog clock and redesigned display.

The Ford AU Fairmont Ghia was further equipped with 16-inch 18-spoke alloy wheels with a bright finish, an eleven speaker 250 watt stereo with six-disc CD player and speed dependent volume control and heavily patterned velour seats with a strip of leather and leather bolsters. Full leather trim – in graphite grey and charcoal – was available as an option and combined with a power adjustable driver’s seat.

Review: Ford AU.II Fairmont (2000-01)

Overview

Released in April 2000, the AU Series II (AU.II) Fairmont introduced structural upgrades, greater refinement and revised suspension (see ‘Developments’, below). Visually, the AU.II Fairmont could be identified by its squarer rear bumper, horizontal grille, larger wheels and tyres, improved cabin trim and rear number plate valance.

Developments

The AU.II Fairmont introduced the following developments:

• Upgraded brakes: thicker front and rear discs (see ‘Brakes’, below), twin-piston aluminium-headed front calipers, bigger non-asbestos brake pads, changes to the master cylinder and a higher capacity booster;
• Structural upgrades to enhance offset front and side impact performance, including a laminated impact protection panel in the driver’s floor area for improved lower leg protection;
• For greater refinement, a laminated firewall and the introduction of 16-inch wheels with 60-series tyres;
• Suspension changes:
  • For the front suspension, the front anti-roll bar was revised and reduced-friction ball joints were introduced;
  • For the rear suspension, a new shock absorber design with improved low speed tunability and reduction friction was introduced;
  • For models with independent rear suspension, changes were made to spring rates, jounce bumpers and shock absorbers for greater ride comfort. The rear top suspension mount was also adjusted and a rear anti-roll bar was fitted as standard; and,
• Service intervals were also extended from 10,000 km to 15,000 km.

Safety equipment

Safety equipment for the AU.II Fairmont was improved and consisted of dual front airbags, traction control and front seatbelts with pretensioners and load limiters made standard across the range; wagons were also fitted with a three-point lap-sash rear centre seatbelt, with the retractor integrated into the seat back.

Brakes

The AU.II Fairmont had 287 mm by 28 mm front brake discs with twin-piston calipers and 287 mm by 16 mm solid rear discs.

ANCAP crash testing

In ANCAP crash testing , the related AU.II Falcon received a three star adult occupant protection rating with a score of 24.2. In the offset crash test, there was a low risk of injury to all body regions, including the driver’s foot and lower leg due to excessive brake pedal movement.

Features

For the AU.II Fairmont, standard features were extended to include 16-inch alloy wheels (with 60-series tyres), six-stack CD player and speed alert with steering wheel controls.

The Fairmont Ghia was further equipped with a six-way power adjustable driver’s seat, while a Carin satellite navigation system was available as an extra-cost option.

2000 Fairmont Ghia 75th Anniversary edition

In November 2000, a limited run 75th Anniversary edition Fairmont Ghia was released, featuring 17-inch ‘Elegance’ alloy wheels, leather seats, a wood/leather Momo steering wheel, floor mats and alarm system. Visually, the 75th Anniversary edition was also distinguished by its side skirts and rear spoiler.

Review: Ford AU.III Fairmont (2001-02)

Overview

Released in October 2001, the AU Series III (AU.III) Fairmont introduced improved equipment levels and a minor cosmetic update. Visually, the AU.III Fairmont could be identified by its smoked headlight surrounds, the side skirts, clear side indicator lenses and darker tinted dot matrix windscreen (for reduced sun glare). The standard Fairmont was also fitted with body-coloured door mirrors.

Features

As part of the update, the AU.III Fairmont was fitted with a six-way power adjustable driver’s seat. The AU.III Fairmont Ghia featured full leather seats, a ten-way power adjustable driver’s seat and driver’s seat and mirror memory functions.

Related links

• Wikipedia.org: Ford AU Falcon

Recalls: Ford EL Fairmont

Overview

Manufacturers, or importers, issue recalls for defects or faults which have the potential to cause injury. Generally, manufacturers will inform the original buyers if their vehicle is subject to a recall and of the steps required to remedy the defect or fault. Please note that the recalls below (if any) are for Australian-delivered vehicles only. Furthermore, the number of recalls should not be taken as an indication of a model’s reliability or its safety more generally.

Recalls: Ford EL Fairmont

No recall information is available for the Ford EL Fairmont. To search for recalls of Ford models, please visit Product Safety Recalls Australia: Ford.

Problems and faults: Ford EL Fairmont

Overview

This section identifies potential problems, causes and fixes based on the experiences of owners and repairers, online sources and technical service bulletins. This information is provided solely for reference purposes and AustralianCar.Reviews recommends that only properly qualified persons carry out repairs or modifications. Furthermore, the number of items below should not be taken as an indicator of a model’s reliability or the frequency with which they may occur.

To report a problem or fault to the AustralianCar.Reviews team, please use the Contact Us form. Note that AustralianCar.Reviews does not offer advice on automotive problems or disputes; such enquiries will not receive a reply. For vehicles purchased from dealers after 1 January 2011, please see our Australian Consumer Law fact sheet.

Engines

• The cylinder head bolts could weaken over time and cause the head gasket to fail, potentially causing the engine to overheat or other serious damage. For a batch of EL models, poor metallurgy in the cylinder head bolts resulted in corrosion and subsequent head gasket failure.
• Belt squeal and rattling noises from the engine bay may be due to a faulty accessory belt tensioner that requires replacement. If the tensioner fails, the accessory belt may snap, causing the power steering, alternator and water pump to stop working.
• The radiator hoses at the water pump and thermostat outlet could swell and burst due to corrosion.
• The O-ring seal at the back of the water pump was also susceptible to leaking.
• Oil may leak from the timing cover seal.
• Variable build quality for the V8 engines could result in rattling lifters, dropped valves, bore distortion and oil-burning.

Transmissions

• Automatic transmissions may need to be rebuilt after 170,000 kilometres – flaring on upshifts and a reluctance to engage top (fourth) gear are indicative of wear.
• Oil may leak from the rear main bearing seal.

Suspension

• The front ball joints were prone to wear, resulting in knocking noises from the front suspension.
• Soft rear springs may sag under heavy loads and require replacement for towing or long distance driving.

Brakes

• Shuddering from the front wheels – which can be felt through the brake pedal – is indicative of warped brake discs.

Problems and faults: Ford EL Fairmont

• Problems with the door locks were usually due to the actuators failing.
• The air conditioning condenser could clog up and cause the compressor to fail.
• The electric fuel pump was susceptible to failure.
• The power steering pump was susceptible to leaking.
• The front power windows may be slow to raise or may do so on an angle due to the glass sticking against the rubber seals – this can be fixed by lubricating the inside of the door frames with silicon spray or graphite powder.
• The boot strut bracket welds can fail and damage the rear seatbelt webbing.

Recalls: Ford BF Fairmont

Overview

Manufacturers, or importers, issue recalls for defects or faults which have the potential to cause injury. Generally, manufacturers will inform the original buyers if their vehicle is subject to a recall and of the steps required to remedy the defect or fault. Please note that the recalls below (if any) are for Australian-delivered vehicles only. Furthermore, the number of recalls should not be taken as an indication of a model’s reliability or its safety more generally.

Recalls: Ford BF Fairmont

• In April 2007, a recall was issued for Ford BF Mk.II vehicles fitted with the ‘E-Gas’ dedicated LPG system/engine and manufactured from November 2006 to March 2007 (PRA 2007/9199). This recall, however, was subsequently extended to models manufactured up to 23 July 2007 (PRA 2007/9580, PRA 2007/9625). In these vehicles, the LPG tanks may have a service valve hand tap fitted with undersized O-rings. As a result, the service valve hand tap could fail, causing LPG to leak from the hand tap spindle and creating a potential fire or explosion hazard.
• In June 2009, a recall was issued for Ford BF Mk. II and Mk. III vehicles fitted with the ‘E-Gas’ dedicated LPG system/engine and manufactured from 16 January 2007 to 22 August 2008 (PRA 2009/10855); in February 2010, however, this recall was extended to vehicles manufactured from 20 October 2008 to 4 September 2009 (PRA 2010/11455). For these vehicles, the brake booster check valve may develop a vacuum leak at the check valve – this could result in reduced power assistance to the vehicle’s brakes.
• In February 2011, a recall was issued for Ford BA and BF models built from 8 May 2002 to 7 March 2008 and with a factory-fitted sunroof. In these vehicles, a bonding problem with the sunroof’s glass panel could result in separation from the frame and potentially dislodge while the vehicle was in motion (PRA 2011/12318).

Problems and faults: Ford BF Fairmont

Overview

This section identifies potential problems, causes and fixes based on the experiences of owners and repairers, online sources and technical service bulletins. This information is provided solely for reference purposes and AustralianCar.Reviews recommends that only properly qualified persons carry out repairs or modifications. Furthermore, the number of items below should not be taken as an indicator of a model’s reliability or the frequency with which they may occur.

To report a problem or fault to the AustralianCar.Reviews team, please use the Contact Us form. Note that AustralianCar.Reviews does not offer advice on automotive problems or disputes; such enquiries will not receive a reply. For vehicles purchased from dealers after 1 January 2011, please see our Australian Consumer Law fact sheet.

BTR transmission

The four-speed BTR automatic transmission had a heat exchanger (or Remote Transmission Oil Cooler, RTOC) under the inlet manifold. However, the lines within the heat exchanger could deteriorate due to age, wear or corrosion, allowing coolant and transmission oil to mix. If this occurred, the fluid in the coolant reservoir would appear milky (hence the term ‘milkshake’) and damage to the transmission would require it to be rebuilt or replaced. To prevent contamination of the transmission fluid with coolant, a common modification was to fit an external air/oil cooler kit to bypass the heat exchanger.

ZF transmission

The six-speed ZF automatic transmissions used an external heat exchanger to cool the transmission. However, the lines within the heat exchanger could deteriorate over time, allowing coolant and transmission oil to mix. If this occurred, the fluid in the coolant reservoir would appear milky (hence the “ZF milkshake”) and, within the transmission, the friction linings would be pulled from their steel backings and the mechatronic control unit would be damaged. To fix, the transmission would have to be rebuilt and the mechatronic control unit replaced.

To prevent contamination of the transmission fluid with coolant, a common modification was to fit an external air/oil cooler kit to bypass the heat exchanger. In fitting these, however, it was important that the transmission fluid be filled to the correct level as the ZF transmission was sensitive to fluid levels and would enter ‘limp home’ mode if not within tolerances. Another modification was to replace the OEM heat exchanger and hoses/lines to the transmission with a more robust after-market product. Please note, however, that Ford Australia considered any modifications to the heat exchanger to void the warranty.

Engines

• Belt squeal and rattling noises from the engine bay may be due to a faulty accessory belt tensioner which requires replacement. If the tensioner fails, the accessory belt may snap, causing the power steering, alternator and water pump to stop working.
• The O-ring seal at the back of the water pump was susceptible to leaking.
• A rattling noise at idle may be due to a loose exhaust heat shield.
• The radiator was susceptible to leaking.
• Low idle, stall or variable idle: for Ford’s BA/BF vehicles, engine speed may drop below the normal idle speed – the engine may then either stall or the ECU may intervene to raise engine speed, causing a variable idle. Ford Australia issued a service bulletin (TSB 20/05) regarding this problem recommending that the throttle body be cleaned and the ECU re-flashed.
• Knocking noises from the engine bay which are loudest near the glovebox may be due to the vacuum hoses vibrating against the body or other components – this can be fixed with a cable-tie.

Rear brake hose service campaign

In May 2007, Ford Australia initiated a ‘service campaign’ to replace the rear brake hoses of 200,000 Ford BA/BF vehicles that were produced from September 2002 to March 2007. In these vehicles, the rear brake hoses were susceptible to excessive wear and could leak. At worst, however, the hoses could rupture. According to Ford, the driver would generally experience reduced braking effectiveness and a warning light would illuminate in the instrument cluster to warn the driver. As part of the service campaign, the brake hoses were replaced during regular servicing performed by Ford dealers.

Brakes

• Shuddering from the front wheels – which can be felt through the brake pedal – is indicative of warped brake discs.
• Squealing noises from the brakes may be due to brake pad glazing (i.e. the friction material overheats on the pad surface and disc). Brake pad glazing may also result in increased stopping distances, brake shudder and vibrations.
• The ABS light may illuminate intermittently due to problems with the ABS sensors – this may be fixed by cleaning or replacing the sensors.

Handbrake

For Ford BA/BF sedans, the handbrake shoe may not centre correctly when the handbrake is released due to the fixed end not holding the show in position – this may cause a ‘cyclic swish type noise’ from the driver’s side rear wheel when driving. Ford Australia issued a technical service bulletin (TSB 09/06) regarding this problem and developed a kit (BA2 2K068 AKIT) to fix whereby a revised park brake shoe centering spring would be fitted and the contact points lubricated.

Suspension

• Knocking noises from front suspension may be due to worn lower ball joints.
• Clunking noises from the rear of the vehicle – particularly at low speeds – may indicate that the differential bushes require replacement.
• Knocking noises from the rear suspension when driving over bumps may indicate that the upper shock bushes require replacement.

Problems and faults: Ford BF Fairmont

• A malfunctioning body computer may turn on the interior lights and drain the battery; if so, the computer needs to be reset.
• Problems with the door locks are usually due to the actuators failing.
• Low battery voltage can make the gearshift indicators flash and the transmission enter ‘limp home’ mode, requiring the battery to be replaced.
• The combination switch for the headlights may only work in the ‘auto’ position or may stop working due to the wires for the manual and automatic operation snapping.
• The inner rear door handles were susceptible to falling off – securing the clips with Blu Tack may alleviate the problem.

Recalls: Ford EF Fairmont

Overview

Manufacturers, or importers, issue recalls for defects or faults which have the potential to cause injury. Generally, manufacturers will inform the original buyers if their vehicle is subject to a recall and of the steps required to remedy the defect or fault. Please note that the recalls below (if any) are for Australian-delivered vehicles only. Furthermore, the number of recalls should not be taken as an indication of a model’s reliability or its safety more generally.

Recalls: Ford EF Fairmont

• In June 1998, a recall was issued for Ford EF Fairmont models fitted with a compact disc changer kit. In these vehicles, wire fouls on the top of the CD changer kit could potentially unlatch the front passenger seat in a high speed collision (PRA 1998/3554).

Problems and faults: Ford EF Fairmont

Overview

This section identifies potential problems, causes and fixes based on the experiences of owners and repairers, online sources and technical service bulletins. This information is provided solely for reference purposes and AustralianCar.Reviews recommends that only properly qualified persons carry out repairs or modifications. Furthermore, the number of items below should not be taken as an indicator of a model’s reliability or the frequency with which they may occur.

To report a problem or fault to the AustralianCar.Reviews team, please use the Contact Us form. Note that AustralianCar.Reviews does not offer advice on automotive problems or disputes; such enquiries will not receive a reply. For vehicles purchased from dealers after 1 January 2011, please see our Australian Consumer Law fact sheet.

Engines

• The cylinder head bolts could weaken over time and cause the head gasket to fail, potentially causing the engine to overheat or other serious damage.
• Belt squeal and rattling noises from the engine bay may be due to a faulty accessory belt tensioner that requires replacement. If the tensioner fails, the accessory belt may snap, causing the power steering, alternator and water pump to stop working.
• The radiator hoses at the water pump and thermostat outlet could swell and burst due to corrosion.
• The O-ring seal at the back of the water pump was susceptible to leaking.
• Oil may leak from the timing cover seal.
• Variable build quality for the V8 engines could result in rattling lifters, dropped valves, bore distortion and oil-burning.

Transmission

• Automatic transmissions may need to be rebuilt after 170,000 kilometres – flaring on upshifts and a reluctance to engage top (fourth) gear are indicative of wear.
• Oil may leak from the rear main bearing seal.

Suspension

• The front ball joints were prone to wear, resulting in knocking noises from the front suspension.
• Soft rear springs may sag under heavy loads and require replacement for towing or long distance driving

Brakes

• Shuddering from the front wheels – which can be felt through the brake pedal – is indicative of warped brake discs.

Problems and faults: Ford EF Fairmont

• Problems with the door locks were usually due to the actuators failing.
• The air conditioning condenser could clog up and cause the compressor to fail.
• The power steering pump was susceptible to leaking.
• The front power windows may be slow to raise or may do so on an angle due to the glass sticking against the rubber seals – this can be fixed by lubricating the inside of the door frames with silicon spray or graphite powder.
• The boot strut bracket welds can fail and damage the rear seatbelt webbing.

Recalls: Ford BA Fairmont

Overview

Manufacturers, or importers, issue recalls for defects or faults which have the potential to cause injury. Generally, manufacturers will inform the original buyers if their vehicle is subject to a recall and of the steps required to remedy the defect or fault. Please note that the number of recalls should not be taken as an indicator of a model’s reliability or its safety more generally.

Recalls: Ford BA Fairmont

• In October 2002, a recall was issued for Ford BA Fairmont sedans fitted with the 4.0-litre inline six cylinder engine and manufactured from 5 September 2002 to 3 October 2002 inclusive. For these vehicles, the inner CV joints of the IRS half shafts fitted to certain models may have been assembled without a retaining circlip – this may allow the half shafts to move away from the inner CV joint and become disengaged (PRA 2002/5759).
• In November 2002, a recall was issued for Ford BA Fairmont models fitted with front side airbags manufactured up to 1 November 2002 (inclusive). In these vehicles, the discharge of static electricity may cause the side airbags to inadvertently deploy when a person is alighting either the passenger or driver’s side front seats (PRA 2002/5825).
• In February 2011, a recall was issued for Ford BA and BF models built from 8 May 2002 to 7 March 2008 and with a factory-fitted sunroof. In these vehicles, a bonding problem with the sunroof’s glass panel could result in separation from the frame and potentially dislodge while the vehicle was in motion (PRA 2011/12318).

Problems and faults: Ford BA Fairmont

Overview

This section identifies potential problems, causes and fixes based on the experiences of owners and repairers, online sources and technical service bulletins. This information is provided solely for reference purposes and AustralianCar.Reviews recommends that only properly qualified persons carry out repairs or modifications. Furthermore, the number of items below should not be taken as an indicator of a model’s reliability or the frequency with which they may occur.

To report a problem or fault to the AustralianCar.Reviews team, please use the Contact Us form. Note that AustralianCar.Reviews does not offer advice on automotive problems or disputes; such enquiries will not receive a reply. For vehicles purchased from dealers after 1 January 2011, please see our Australian Consumer Law fact sheet.

Engines

• Belt squeal and rattling noises from the engine bay may be due to a faulty accessory belt tensioner which requires replacement. If the tensioner fails, the accessory belt may snap, causing the power steering, alternator and water pump to stop working.
• A rattling noise at idle may be due to a loose exhaust heat shield.
• The radiator was susceptible to leaking.
• The O-ring seal at the back of the water pump was susceptible to leaking.
• Low idle, stall or variable idle: for Ford’s BA/BF vehicles, engine speed may drop below the normal idle speed – the engine may then either stall or the ECU may intervene to raise engine speed, causing a variable idle. Ford Australia issued a service bulletin (TSB 20/05) regarding this problem recommending that the throttle body be cleaned and the ECU re-flashed.
• Knocking noises from the engine bay which are loudest near the glovebox may be due to the vacuum hoses vibrating against the body or other components – this can be fixed with a cable-tie.

Barra 220 V8 engine: chain tensioners and rattling on start-up

The Barra 220 V8 engine was initially fitted with plastic chain tensioners. Over time, the plastic chain tensioners would wear out and lose tension, causing a rattling noise on start-up (see video below) and oil to drain out. It is understood that metal chain tensioners were introduced late in the production of the Ford BA Mk II.

Transmission

• Four-speed BTR automatic transmission: the transmission cooler was located in the radiator and the cooling lines were susceptible to failure due to age, wear or corrosion. If this occurred, the fluid in the coolant reservoir would appear milky (hence the term ‘milkshake’) and damage to the transmission would require it to be rebuilt or replaced. To prevent contamination of the transmission fluid with coolant, a common modification was to fit an external air/oil transmission cooling kit which bypassed (and sealed) the cooler in the radiator.
• Difficulty selecting gears may be due to a loose gear selector linkage/mechanism.

Steering shudder

In December 2004, Ford Australia issued a technical service bulletin (TSB 98R/04) for Ford BA vehicles with six-cylinder engines due to fluid pulsations in the power steering system causing the steering wheel to shudder – this generally occurred during low speed manoeuvres like parking. To fix, the power steering system was to be bled; if that did not fix the problem, a new high-pressure power steering hose was to be fitted and the system bled.

Rear brake hose service campaign

In May 2007, Ford Australia initiated a ‘service campaign’ to replace the rear brake hoses of 200,000 Ford BA/BF vehicles that were produced from September 2002 to March 2007. In these vehicles, the rear brake hoses were susceptible to excessive wear and could leak. At worst, however, the hoses could rupture. While the river would generally experience reduced braking effectiveness and a warning light would illuminate in the instrument cluster, drivers have reported a complete loss of braking that required the handbrake to be deployed to slow the vehicle. As part of the service campaign, the brake hoses were replaced during regular servicing performed by Ford dealers.

Brakes

• Shuddering from the front wheels – which can be felt through the brake pedal – is indicative of warped brake discs.
• Squealing noises from the brakes may be due to brake pad glazing (i.e. the friction material overheats on the pad surface and disc). Brake pad glazing may also result in increased stopping distances, brake shudder and vibrations.
• The ABS light may illuminate intermittently due to problems with the ABS sensors – this may be fixed by cleaning or replacing the sensors.

Handbrake

For Ford BA/BF sedans, the handbrake shoe may not centre correctly when the handbrake is released due to the fixed end not holding the show in position – this may cause a ‘cyclic swish type noise’ from the driver’s side rear wheel when driving. Ford Australia issued a technical service bulletin (TSB 09/06) regarding this problem and developed a kit (BA2 2K068 AKIT) to fix whereby a revised park brake shoe centering spring would be fitted and the contact points lubricated.

Suspension

• Knocking noises from front suspension may be due to worn lower ball joints.
• Clunking noises from the rear of the vehicle – particularly at low speeds – may indicate that the differential bushes require replacement. For a batch of vehicles produced from 2002 to late 2003, the differential itself was replaced under warranty.
• Knocking noises from the rear suspension when driving over bumps may indicate that the upper shock bushes require replacement.
• For noisy rear shock absorbers, a technical service bulletin was issued due to the bolts being incorrectly torqued on some 2003 models.

Problems and faults: Ford BA Fairmont

• A malfunctioning body computer may turn on the interior lights and drain the battery; if so, the computer needs to be reset.
• Problems with the door locks are usually due to the actuators failing.
• Low battery voltage can make the gearshift indicators flash and the transmission enter ‘limp home’ mode, requiring the battery to be replaced.

Recalls: Ford AU Fairmont

Overview

Manufacturers, or importers, issue recalls for defects or faults which have the potential to cause injury. Generally, manufacturers will inform the original buyers if their vehicle is subject to a recall and of the steps required to remedy the defect or fault. Please note that the recalls below (if any) are for Australian-delivered vehicles only. Furthermore, the number of recalls should not be taken as an indication of a model’s reliability or its safety more generally.

Recalls: Ford AU Fairmont

• In April 1999, a recall was issued for Ford AU Fairmont models manufactured from 19 March 1999 to 22 March 1999 due to the bolts which secured the upper suspension arm to the upper bushes potentially having been affected by hydrogen embrittlement – this could result in suspension noise and, in extreme cases, the upper arms may separate from the bushes (PRA 1999/3907).
• In June 1999, a recall was issued for Ford AU models manufactured prior to 24 March 1999 due to incorrectly torqued front spindle upper ball joint retaining bolts (PRA 1999/3967).
• In February 2001, a recall was issued for Ford AU Series I and Series II models fitted with six cylinder engines (including LPG engines) and manufactured from 2 October 1999 to 31 January 2001. For these vehicles, the throttle cable grommet was susceptible to failure – if damaged and not replaced, the accelerator may be rendered inoperative, resulting in a sudden loss of power (PRA 2001/4640).
• In August 2001, a recall was issued for Ford AU Series I and Series II models fitted with accessory-fitted heavy duty (1600kg and 1800kg) towbar goosenecks; factory-fitted goosenecks were not affected. The accessory-fitted goosenecks were susceptible to becoming brittle, which may result in the gooseneck fracturing in service and the trailer separating (PRA 2001/4856).
• In April 2002, a recall was issued for Ford AU Series III models fitted with ABS and manufactured on 5 December 2001, 6 December 2001, 13 December 2001 and 14 December 2001. In these vehicles, the ABS modules may lose all brake fluid from the front braking circuit (PRA 2002/5303).
• In June 2004, a recall was issued for Ford AU Series I and Series II models manufactured from 1 June 1998 to 22 May 2001 (inclusive). For these vehicles, inappropriate servicing of the steering rack retaining hardware may affect the integrity of the steering rack mounting stud. Furthermore, over-tightening of the steering rack mounting hardware may degrade the thread-locking compound (PRA 2004/7066).

Problems and faults: Ford AU Fairmont

Overview

This section identifies potential problems, causes and fixes based on the experiences of owners and repairers, online sources and technical service bulletins. This information is provided solely for reference purposes and AustralianCar.Reviews recommends that only properly qualified persons carry out repairs or modifications. Furthermore, the number of items below should not be taken as an indicator of a model’s reliability or the frequency with which they may occur.

To report a problem or fault to the AustralianCar.Reviews team, please use the Contact Us form. Note that AustralianCar.Reviews does not offer advice on automotive problems or disputes; such enquiries will not receive a reply. For vehicles purchased from dealers after 1 January 2011, please see our Australian Consumer Law fact sheet.

Engines

• Head gasket failures were less common than previous generations, but coolant loss still posed a risk of overheating the engine.
• Belt squeal and rattling noises from the engine bay may be due to a faulty accessory belt tensioner that requires replacement. If the tensioner fails, the accessory belt may snap, causing the power steering, alternator and water pump to stop working.
• A rough idle may be due to a loose inlet manifold which requires tightening or the spark plug leads may need to be replaced.
• AU.II and AU.III models were fitted with aluminium radiator cores with resin header tanks that were susceptible to failure.
• An extremely low oil pressure reading when the engine is hot and idling may actually be due to an electrical earthing problem.
• A ticking noise from behind the left headlight may be due to a failed purge valve solenoid.
• The O-ring seal at the back of the water pump was susceptible to leaking.
• Variable build quality for the V8 engines could result in rattling lifters, dropped valves, bore distortion and oil-burning.

Transmissions

• Oil may leak from the rear transmission seal.

Suspension

• Knocking noises from front suspension may be due to worn lower ball joints.
• Knocking noises from the front of the vehicle, vague steering and squeaking noises when turning are indicative of steering rack failure.
• For models with independent rear suspension, knocking or banging noises from the rear suspension may require the top shock absorbers mounts to be replaced.

Brakes

• Shuddering from the front wheels – which can be felt through the brake pedal – is indicative of warped brake discs.
• The level of power braking assistance may decrease due to the brake booster deteriorating – this was primarily a problem for AU.I models.

Problems and faults: Ford AU Fairmont

• For manual models, the firewall and pedal box could crack, enabling water to leak into the driver’s footwell. Reinforced brackets may help prevent further cracking in the firewall.
• The horn may stick when depressed or not sound at all, requiring the horn pad and airbag module (a single unit) to be replaced.
• The six-stack CD changers were susceptible to failure.
• Water could accumulate in the boot gutters, flow over the rubber seals and leak into the boot due to a poor seal between the boot and rubber seals.
• Problems with the door locks are usually due to the actuators failing.Inaccurate fuel gauge readings may require the fuel sender unit to be replaced.
• The front power windows may stop working due to dust within the switch blocking the contact points. Dissembling the switches and cleaning the contacts may fix the problem; alternatively, an aerosol contact cleaner could be sprayed into the switch via a nozzle. However, pressing the window switch up and down thirty-one (31) times may reset the window motor/regulator and restore operation.
• The front power windows may be slow to raise or may do so on an angle due to the glass sticking against the rubber seals – this can be fixed by lubricating the inside of the door frames with silicon spray or graphite powder.
• The fuel gauge may provide inaccurate readings due to faulty fuel senders.