Recalls

Recalls & faults: Renault X95 Megane (2010-16)

Recalls: Renault X95 Megane

Overview

Manufacturers, or importers, issue recalls for defects or faults which have the potential to cause injury. Generally, manufacturers will inform the original buyers if their vehicle is subject to a recall and of the steps required to remedy the defect or fault. Please note that the recalls below (if any) are for Australian-delivered vehicles only. Furthermore, the number of recalls should not be taken as an indication of a model’s reliability or its safety more generally.

Recalls: Renault X95 Megane

No recall information is available for the Renault X95 Megane. To search for recalls of Renault models, please visit Product Safety Recalls Australia: Renault.


Problems and faults: Renault X95 Megane

Overview

This section identifies potential problems, causes and fixes based on the experiences of owners and repairers, online sources and technical service bulletins. This information is provided solely for reference purposes and AustralianCar.Reviews recommends that only properly qualified persons carry out repairs or modifications. Furthermore, the number of items below should not be taken as an indicator of a model’s reliability or the frequency with which they may occur.

To report a problem or fault to the AustralianCar.Reviews team, please use the Contact Us form. Note that AustralianCar.Reviews does not offer advice on automotive problems or disputes; such enquiries will not receive a reply. For vehicles purchased from dealers after 1 January 2011, please see our Australian Consumer Law fact sheet.

2013-15 Renault X95 Megane with 1.2-litre turbo engine: excessive oil consumption

For Renault X95 Megane vehicles, 1.2-litre turbocharged petrol engines (Renault’s ‘1.2 TCe’) produced prior to 25 July 2015 were susceptible to excessive oil consumption and the following symptoms:

  • Illumination of the check engine light;
  • Abnormal engine noises; and,
  • Black exhaust smoke.

These symptoms were attributed to insufficient pressure in the intake manifold which, in combination with high vacuum in the cylinder, caused a lack of sealing at the second piston ring. As a result, engine oil was sucked into the combustion chamber and burned.

Both Renault’s 1.2 TCe and Nissan’s 1.2 DIG-T engines were affected by this problem and Nissan/Renault addressed this problem with the following measures:

  • Initially, the engine control unit (ECU) was re-programmed with updated software to increase pressure in the intake manifold during low engine loads; and,
  • If oil consumption was still sufficiently high that it was at its minimum level after 1600 km, then the piston rings were to be replaced. If the engine was noisy, then the chain tensioner, short block assembly or engine itself may need to be replaced depending on the diagnosis.


Back To Top